Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Overview & Contact Data

Retraction Watch is a research-integrity website that tracks retractions in the scientific literature and examines the reasons behind them. Founded by Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus, the site uses retractions as a window into the scientific process, offering readers a closer look at how errors, data concerns, publication practices, and peer-review problems become visible after papers appear. The site publishes articles, commentary, and case studies that explain why published work is withdrawn or corrected, making it a useful resource for scientists, editors, librarians, journalists, funders, and institutions that need reliable information about research credibility. One of its most notable features is the retraction database and retractions list, which help users search, monitor, and analyze withdrawn papers across disciplines. The database makes it easier to identify patterns that might otherwise be missed, such as clusters of papers from the same institutions, authors, or publication networks. Coverage can include high-visibility cases involving large numbers of withdrawn articles, covid retractions, and controversies around suspicious manuscripts, including stories that mention Jalil publications, Jalil researchers under scrutiny, or a data flood that raises questions about quality control. This focus gives readers a practical way to follow research misconduct and publication ethics without needing access to private retraction notices. Retraction Watch stands out because it turns a routine part of scholarly publishing into a public conversation about accountability. Its reporting often highlights how retractions affect trust in science, how journals and publishers handle questionable submissions, and what researchers can do to protect their own records. For readers who want a clear, evidence-based account of retracted work, the site provides context that goes beyond a simple list, connecting individual cases to broader issues in research integrity, data management, and the peer-review system.